San Francisco Schtuff

San Francisco real estate, events, food and neighborhood

Year in Wrap

End of the year stats for your number crunching pleasure:

2006 Potrero Hill Single Family Home Sales
42 Homes sold (48 home sales in 2005)
Average sale price: $1,079,751 (2005 average sales price: $971,426)
Average Size: 1600 Square feet (2005 average size: 1396 square feet)

2006 Potrero Hill Lofts/Condo/TIC Sales
84 Homes sold (109 home sales in 2005)
Average sale price: $767,651 (2005 average sales price: $742,184)
Average size: 1440 square feet (2005 average size: 1456 square feet)

2006 Glen Park Single Faimily Home Sales
55 Homes sold (67 home sales in 2005)
Average sales price: $961,657 (2005 average sales price: $1,037,813)
Average size: 1501 square feet (2005 average size: 1769 square feet)

2006 Glen Park Loft/Condo/TIC sales
15 Homes sold (29 home sales in 2005)
Average sales price: $737,667 (2005 average sales price: $746,406)
Average size: 1288 square feet (2005 average size: 1654 square feet)

2006 Bernal Heights Single Family Home Sales
163 Homes Sold (193 home sales in 2005)
Average sales price: $852,272 (2005 average sales price: $824,609)
Average size: (no accurate data) (2005 average size: 1302 square feet)

2006 Bernal Heights Loft/Condo/TIC sales
43 Homes sold (28 home sales in 2005)
Average sales price: $565,893 (2005 average sales price: $652,316)
Average size: 1329 square feet (2005 average size: 1224 square feet)

2006 Noe Valley Single Family Home Sales
136 Homes sold (168 home sales in 2005)
Average sales price: $1,401,121 (2005 average sales price: $1,312,890)
Average size: 1957 square feet (2005 average size: 1803 square feet)

2006 Noe Valley Loft/Condo/TIC sales
150 Homes Sold (145 homes sold in 2005)
Average sales price: $806,807 (2005 average sales price: $820,893)
Average size: 1374 square feet (2005 average size: 1417 square feet)

Filed under: Ggold, stats ,

Mortgage Wrap

By: Jason Russell

I’ll end the year by offering a few thoughts about the new tax law that was passed as one of the last acts of the 109th Congress – providing a tax deduction for PMI, known better as mortgage insurance.

When you buy a house and make less than a 20 down payment, lenders give you one of two options to compensate for the absence of a 20% down payment - mortgage insurance or a piggyback loan (known also as a 2nd mortgage).

Mortgage insurance is the old-school method. The borrower (you!) pay for the policy, but the lender is the beneficiary. You are essentially paying to guarantee you can make your payments. If the lender has to foreclose, the mortgage insurance policy reimburses the lender for the associated costs. Premiums depend on the size of the loan, down payment, your credit score and the type of mortgage insurance you opt for. What people fail to realize is that you are not only paying the entire financed amount but the PMI as well (90%, if you have a 10% down payment, for example). This is a strategy without merit in my opinion.

Piggyback loans or 2nd mortgages loans are the new way of dealing with a down payment of less than 20 percent. With a piggyback loan, you have two home loans: a 1st loan of 80 percent and a second mortgage for the balance. With a 5 percent down payment, you would get what’s called an 80-15-5 mortgage: an 80 percent loan, a 15 percent piggyback and the 5 percent down payment. The 2nd loan is either a fixed-rate home equity loan or a variable-rate home equity line of credit and eliminates the need for PMI.

Although many experts argue PMI is logical and should be examined as an alternative to a 2nd mortgage. I would not recommend this option for anyone – partly due to the flawed logic of PMI and partly because it won’t apply to many of us (good reasoning, eh ?). Would you pay an insurance policy that names your doctor as the beneficiary? To me, PMI seems similar to this idea. The tax deduction applies only to mortgages that are closed in 2007, has income limits (you get the full deduction if your income is $100,000 or less and phases out rapidly after that; no mortgage insurance deduction is available if you make more than $110,000).

My 2 cents – I have always felt as if PMI was a waste of money – and I have a feeling the lobbying to pass this tax break was heavily funded by the folks that write private PMI policies.

Rates are looking very attractive – rates are in the low to mid 6% range. If you are holding a short-term loan that will start to adjust before you plan to move or sell the house, you may think about a refinance into something more stable. You do sacrifice the lower payment you have now, but it may pay off in the long run – as most economists are pointing to higher interest rates in the future.

Happy New Year….Please let me know if I can be of assistance.

 

Best Regards – Jason

_____________________________
Jason Russell, Broker
Rob Wolf and Associates
Residential & Commercial Financing
850 Montgomery Street, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94133
1-415-788-1334 – office
1-866-313-5709 – fax

Filed under: mortgage , ,

Rules to Live By

There has been much discussion regarding the ethics behind a real estate agent being able to change the status of an old listing (expired or withdrawn from the market) to new by withdrawing it and waiting two weeks before it was reentered.

According to the San Francisco Association of Realtors “effective January 1st 2007, the waiting period to relist a property as “new” after withdrawal will be extended from the current 14 days to 30 days.

Also effective January 1st, properties which expire cannot be reentered as “new” by the same listing agent or office for 30 days.

This change was made in response to complaints by users about “churning”. Re-entering a listing as new when it has been on the market recently, is unethical and provides inaccurate information to both users of the MLS as well as the public.”

Filed under: Ggold, news , ,

Different Approach

A home is more than just an investment and I think it’s important that folks understand that. Over the last several years, home sellers have made remarkable returns on their investments, some would argue they were/are reminiscent of the dot-com bubble and huge stock returns. Nothing lasts forever (especially too good to be true investments) and it’s been made clear that double digit returns on homes in a two year period is something that is coming to an end. I by no means want to take away from the fact that a home is a great investment over time (over time being the key words), but it’s more than just a place to make money. A home is a place to live, to eat, to grow, to rest, to spend time with loved ones and to feel good. A home is more than a money making instrument and today’s home buyers should understand that.

There is no doubt and no refuting the evidence that over time, historically, homes appreciate. There are times where they appreciate quickly, there are times of stagnation and even times of loss, but given enough time, a home will be worth more than what it was purchased for. If a home buyer (and I’m not talking about real estate investors here) looks to the home first as a place to live and second as an investment (the two year flip is a hard thing to do these days), they will do just fine in the long run. Give it a few years, relax, make your home your temple, enjoy this fabulous city and rather than stretch your every last dollar on a home you cannot afford because you think it will appreciate above the average, move into a home that you feel good in and allows you a bit more financial breathing room–what’s the rush?

Filed under: Uncategorized

Bernal Height’s — ‘05 vs ‘06

Over the course of the next few days, we’ll be comparing ‘05 and ‘06 sales in our favorite neighborhoods — since our office is in Bernal, let’s start with Bernal.

Bernal Heights – 2006 Single Family House Sales
Total Sales (as of 12/13/06) 156 houses
Average List Price – $819,000
Average Sales Price -$850,000
Days on Market — 37
Number of houses “withdrawn or expired” – 33 (after an average of 77 days on the market)

Bernal Heights — 2005 Single Family House Sales
Total Sales (01/01/05 to 12/31/05) – 197 houses
Average List Price – $738,000
Average Sales Price – $823,000
Days on Market — 32
Number of houses “withdrawn or expired” - 33 (after an average of 44 days on the market)

For me, the most telling statistic is the difference in days on market for the houses that are withdrawn from the market — it appears as though sellers to some extent, are starting to understand that being on the market for more than 30 days is not reason to panic.

Filed under: Bernal Heights, stats , ,

A Little More Conversation…

It’s been many moons since I’ve asked for reader participation, but I was really hoping to spark a little conversation on the blog. Greg and I post content that we hope community members find informational, interesting, helpful and/or amusing. We are always open to suggestions or tips for content and we also offer our readers the opportunity to comment, but we can’t seem to spark a discussion (don’t be shy!). Please, ask questions, make suggestions, provide tips, point out errors–we’ll do our best to address and include everything.

Filed under: Ggold, random ,

Dildo Factory

vixen.gif

A dildo factory in the Dogpatch!?!?!

“Vixen Creations was started in 1992 by Marily Bishara, who was a Bay Area IT consultant who literally saw a hole in the sex toy market that needed to be, ahem, filled. The sex toy market was (and still is) full of poor-quality toys.”

“Because it’s San Francisco we do things delightfully differently here. We don’t have just any dildo factory — we have one driven by a message of sexual pleasure and health, in a drop-dead gorgeous aluminum and curved wall warehouse in Dogpatch, staffed by people with more than a spring in their step and the best working conditions and employee benefits this side of the dot-com boom.”

Violet and the Dildo Factory
[SF Gate]
Vixen Creations Inc. [website]

Filed under: Central Waterfront, Ggold, neighborhood changes, random , ,

The LEAST Expensive Homes in the ‘Hood

Below is a peek into the least expensive Single Family Homes in Potrero Hill, Glen Park, Noe Valley, and Bernal Heights

Potrero Hill
1458 Kansas Street
$808,000
27 Days on the market
Fact: price reduced by $80,000

Glen Park
99 Surrey St
$499,000
12 Days on the Market
Fact: No pictures in the MLS, out of city agent and he describes it as “rustic.”

Noe Valley

3790 Cesar Chavez Street
$825,000
68 Days on the Market
Fact: At one point was priced at $950,000 and back in 1994 it expired after being on the market for 180 days priced at $259,950.

Bernal Heights

1510 York Street
$550,000
32 Days on the Market
Fact: Was listed at $599,950 in August with a different listing agent and one less bedroom? Magically it now has two beds, in August, it only had 1!

Filed under: stats , ,

The Most Expensive Homes in the ‘Hood

Below is a peek into the most expensive Single Family Homes in Potrero Hill, Glen Park, Noe Valley, and Bernal Heights

Potrero Hill
733 De haro Street
$1.975m
80 Days on the market
fact: price reduced 1 time.


Glen Park

1720 Sanchez Street
$1.125m
101 Days on the market
fact: sold for $1.3m in 2005


Noe Valley

554 Valley Street
$2.879m
24 Days on the market
fact: listing was on the market for 108 days prior to current listing (aka this is the 3rd time on the market, this time at a reduced price)


Bernal Heights

27 Benton Ave
$1.198m
32 Days on Market
fact: you can hear the freeway roar from just about every room

Filed under: stats , ,